Text Levels– Tool or Trouble?

by Irene Fountas, Author and Director of the Center for Reading Recovery and Literacy Collaborative


When my colleague Gay Su Pinnell and I created a gradient of text for teachers to use in selecting books for small group reading, we were excited about its potential for helping teachers make good text decisions to support the progress of readers.

Our alphabetic gradient is widely used by teachers for this purpose and has become an essential tool for effective teaching in guided reading lessons.

With every good intention, the levels may have been applied by professionals in ways we would not have intended. We did not intend for levels to become a label for children that would take us back to the days of the bluebirds and the blackbirds or the jets and the piper cubs. Our intention was to put the tool in the hands of educators who understood their characteristics and used it to select appropriate books for differentiated instruction.

We are well aware of the importance of communicating student progress accurately to families. Rather than the use of levels in reporting to families, we have encouraged the use of terms like “reading at grade level expectation” or “reading above grade level expectation” or “not yet reading at grade level expectation” on report cards along with other clear indicators of a student’s processing abilities such as understanding, word-solving abilities, accuracy or fluency. In addition we have encouraged the use of indicators related to amount and breadth of independent reading.

Students actually experience a variety of books at varied levels in a rich literacy program. They may experience complex texts as read aloud or shared reading selections and a range of levels in book discussion groups or independent reading. Highly effective teaching provides a range of opportunities with different texts for different purposes.

In our best efforts to use assessment indicators, we want to be sure that our purposes best serve the children we teach and give families the important information they need. This may not mean using labels such as book levels that hold more complexities and are intended for the use of the educators as they make day-to-day teaching decisions.

14 thoughts on “Text Levels– Tool or Trouble?

  1. No one can say it better than Dr. Fountas! All of the administrators and teachers in our district have received this! Thank you!

    • Thank you! I wish we would evaluate children on the progress they have made as an individual—not the teacher-generated level they are expected to be reading at a specific point in the school year!

  2. Thank you for this! I wish I could share it with my own daughter’s school and administration! Telling the students their level is serving to be a major downfall in the confidence of my daughter, let alone others as well.

    • the take-away for me from this blog entry is the importance of readers/writers working with a variety of text forms across various levels. i think it’s unrealistic to keep learners and their families in the dark about levels. even the youngest readers come to see the levels printed on texts. rather than ignoring this and telling parents and children that “levels don’t matter”, we need to deepen their understanding of the benefits in reading challenging, easy and just-right books in the different ways that make reading for meaning possible.

      a young student once picked up a book from a desk that was far beyond her instructional level, saying that she wanted to read the story but knew it was too hard. i simply reminded her that she could indeed read that book through a read-aloud. she did end up taking the book home and asking an older sister to read it to her. when she returned to school the next day she was so excited to tell me about the story and told me that she’d be able to read that book on her very own one day.

      we are working on helping parents understand the gradient of text difficulty. we are beginning to do this by carefully sharing of pieces of the continuum, in parent-friendly ways. this way they can see what their child is capable of doing and the next steps we will work together through to support their child in becoming a proficient reader who is confident and engaged, and who just can’t wait to jump into a new book!

  3. We have been discussing this topic in depth this year and trying as a grade-level team to determine the best way to show kids where to do their book shopping. In the past, large bookmarks were used that indicated, month-by-month, the level where each child was reading independently. I have opted not to go this route this year as I saw the pressure it put on children not to mention the competition it brewed. But I still need to direct kiddos to bins within our leveled library. Do you//others have suggestions on doing this successfully? Thank you in advance!

    • reply from Irene Fountas


      You are very thoughtful about the importance of children accessing books that they can enjoy. Consider creating a browsing basket for the guided reading group and put in it some books for them to reread as well as some varied levels of books below their instructional level. Tell them you created a blue basket that has many books they will enjoy.

      Teach minilessons on how to choose books that they can enjoy and understand. We scripted some of those in Guiding Readers and Writers as examples. The focus is on having the students try a page and see if they can read it smoothly and understand.

      Also be sure all the baskets you create have a range of levels for children to choose. You may want to book talk easier and harder books to bless the easier ones for kids who need them.

      Hope this helps!

  4. Irene,
    I have missed seeing you at Heinmann events, but I am about to teach a class to a group of K-1 teachers and this is a perfect compliment to the content about selecting books for small group guided reading as well as the way we can become too reliant on a number and forget that we teach kids – and the kids teach us.

    On another note, we are starting our study of the Continuum K-8 alongside our use of the Comprehensive Language and Literacy Guide.

    Finally, we continue to enjoy LLI and are seeing the exceptional results. I hope we can add more to our work and have recommended this for our middle schools as the kits become available. I SO enjoyed our time in Boston as we worked through some of the ideas related to moving LLI into middle grades.

    Thank you for all your work and guidance throughout the years.

    Karen (from Little Rock, AR)

      • You found me!!! yea! I hope to see you soon – it’s been far too long!

        Amazing how the thread of important teaching remains constant while we add to it with new refinement and learning.

        Say hi to the queen if you see her — but I thought you were the queen :)

  5. It is wonderful to hear again the common sense and smart instructional underpinnings of the guided reading levels. It spurred me to post a reflective blog of my own today http://bookmansbytes.blogspot.com/ ….and to want thank Irene and Gay Sue for their tireless advocacy for readers and the teachers and librarians who strive to put the right book in the right readers hands.

  6. For a district that does list the F&P level on the report card at the end of the year, how can we do so responsibly, when the goal is to communicate with parents about the characteristics of text that their children have mastered, in relation to grade level expectations?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s